is based on an idea generated when we first
met and spent the weekend in Tintagel, England,
overlooking the sea in the home of King Arthur.
We named our project in tribute to the vision
behind the utopian idea of the Round Table
- and have structured all our efforts in this
Since its inception, Project
Camelot has become a leader in the area of
whistleblower testimony by providing filmed
interviews, shot guerrilla style, on location,
with key witnesses and researchers from all
around the world. We have traveled to remote
corners of the globe and revealed secrets
in areas previously only known to a select
few from secret societies and those with high
level security clearances in the secret governments.
Ever since our launch in 2006
we have been financing Project Camelot solely
out of our own pockets and with the generous
help of donations from visitors to our site.
We thank you sincerely all for your help and
support, without which we could not do what
we do. We will continue as long as our funds
and contributions make this all possible.
Note: for those who are wondering
about the Cheetah logo and now the Snow Leopard
used here on Kerry's site, Project Camelot
Productions, and also on Bill's site Project
Avalon. It is a nod to the famous MGM Lion...
A nod to the power of film (and video) in
making manifest the amazing facets of worlds
and realities, to display for scrutiny and
analysis and wonder what it means to be human.
Camelot interviews are shot
in a guerilla style that captures the interpersonal
dynamic as well as enables the viewer to determine
whether the truth is being told, some facsimile
thereof, or a lie.. The camera reveals this
in the facial expression, voice, tone and
body language of the subject, and gives us
added insight into what resonates and what
does not. It gives us a candid picture of
not only the person but also reveals the more
subtle layers underneath. We pick up subliminal
cues and as viewers can come to our own conclusions,
without being limited or misled by edited
sound bytes, canned commentaries or misdirects
by the interviewer that interfere with a determination
of what is truth and what is fantasy or simply